Wednesday, March 6, 2013

Does a Portland Oregon Judge have a Legal Right to Say who the Constitution Applies to and Who it Does Not?


Well, in the Case of Blogger Crystal Cox, that is exactly what happened.

Judge Marco Hernandez RULED that the First Amendment did not apply to Crystal Cox, a U.S Citizen, because she was not a "Journalist" and connected to a known media outlet.

However, the Constitution applies to ALL Citizens and not simply "Journalists".

Judge Marco Hernandez said that Kevin Padrick and Obsidian Finance Group were not  Public Figures, Though it has been established long ago in the courts that a Bankruptcy Trustee is a Public Figure,

For more on the FACT that a bankruptcy trustee is a public figure, click below
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2012/11/so-is-bankruptcy-trustee-officer-of.html

Kevin Padrick, David W. Brown and Obsidian Finance Group have received millions in grants for the State of Oregon and even sued the State of Oregon. 

More on this topic of Solar Tax Credits, Entitlement and Suing the State of Oregon
http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/search?q=Tax+Credits

Kevin Padrick, is well known for corporate takeovers, and in my opinion had no business being a bankruptcy trustee with the "highest fiduciary duty", especially when he had signed a contract with the company who went bankrupt to help them restructure their business.

More on this topic

http://kevinpadrickobsidianfinance.blogspot.com/2012/04/kevin-padricks-testimony-in-obsidian-v.html

http://www.objectiontofees.com/

http://kevinpadrickobsidianfinance.blogspot.com/2013/02/summit-1031-bankruptcy-whistle-blower.html

http://www.obsidianfinancesucks.com/

Imagine a Judge Telling You, that the Constitution does not Apply to YOU, because you are not a Journalist, and associated with a known "Media" 

Judge Marco Hernandez said, "there are no First Amendment implications", in a Judicial Ruling the day before the Obsidian Finance Group v. Crystal Cox trial. Yet all citizens are entitled to constitutional rights, and Judge Marco Hernandez, has no lawful or constitutional right to say who the First Amendment applies to and who it does not.

Order, Day Before Trial
http://www.rcfp.org/sites/default/files/docs/20111208_164702_cox_opinion.pdf

Imagine, a Judge stripping you of your Constitutional rights, you get a $2.5 Million Dollar Judgement against you, and then insult to injury, the attorney for the Opposition, pulls out a part of one of your eMails to him, that you emailed acting as your own attorney, in attempt to STOP a 10 Million Dollar lawsuit against you, and sends this to the New York Times, Forbes, Seattle Weekly and other media outlets, and accuses you of trying to Extort him and his client. This AFTER he already WON, simply to retaliate, maliciously defame and because he is an attorney and above the law.

More on this topic,

http://www.investigativeblogger.com/2013/03/big-media-forbes-and-new-york-times.html

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2012/04/crystal-cox-extortion-allegations.html

http://obsidianfinancesucks.blogspot.com/2012/10/if-you-believe-that-blogger-crystal-cox.html

Imagine an Attorney so desperate to STOP an appeal to the Ninth Circuit that he seeks counsel from your former attorney, and together they conspire to simply file a lien, and have a Sheriff's Sale, in which auctions off your right to appeal, and attempt to force you to take a settlement of sorts, because you had rejected the 8 prior settlement offers.

More on the Sheriff Sale to Auction off my Right to Appeal
http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/search?q=Right+to+Appeal

More on the Settlement Offers Obsidian Finance Group made to me, via David Aman
http://www.crystalcoxcase.com/2012/11/settlement-communication-of-obsidian-v.html

Attorneys should not have special privileges in matters of law. Attorneys such as David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm and Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group simply bully defendants they sue, bully those they want depositions from, twist the facts, manipulate the law and judges; and yet, they seem to have special privileges to push around, lie about, defame, harass, manipulate, intimidate who ever they choose and have no consequences whatsoever, just because they are attorneys.

Obsidian Finance Group V. Crystal Cox, Ninth Circuit Appeal Documents

Opening Brief by UCLA Law Professor, Attorney Eugene Volokh
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/132977266/Eugene-Volokh-Crystal-L-Cox-Appeal-Obsidian-Vs-Cox-Appeal-Opening-Brief

Reply Brief by UCLA Law Professor, Attorney Eugene Volokh
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/144314839/Obsidian-Finance-Group-LLC-V-Crystal-Cox-Eugene-Volokh-Reply--Response-Brief

Amicus Brief Filed By the Reporters Committee for Freedom of the Press
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/133593941/Obsidian-V-Cox-Appeal-the-Reporters-Committee-for-Freedom-of-the-Press

Amicus Brief Filed By ScotusBlog.com
http://www.docstoc.com/docs/133576894/ScotusBlogcom-Amicus-Brief-Regarding-Obsidian-Vs-Cox-Appeal


Regarding Marc Randazza's Involvement in Obsidian v. Cox

Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group negotiated with David S. Aman of Tonkon Torp Law Firm after Blogger Crystal Cox's Trial, and on behalf of Crystal Cox. This was after Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group spoke with Crystal Cox about representing her, and claimed to be doing a conflicts check and would get back to her. Instead, Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group simply went about the negotiation of some deal that Crystal Cox, to this day has no idea what the terms were. And though Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group did not get back to Crystal Cox about representing her, and time was running out to file for her Ninth Circuit appeal, he told other members of the First Amendment bar that he, indeed did represent Crystal Cox, and therefore he interred with other representation. Due to this unethical treatment, Crystal Cox chose another attorney who she thought would be better to represent the issue of Constitutional Rights for all Citizens, Investigative Bloggers and all Citizen Journalists.

When Crystal Cox thought that Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group would represent her, she bought MarcRandazza.com to do PR on her case, as that is what she does, and clearly Marc Randazza knew this. Yet after Crystal Cox made it clear to Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group that he was FIRED from negotiations regarding her Ninth Circuit appeal, Marc Randazza launched a hate and defamation campaign against Crystal Cox, which has last over a year.

In order to fight back, Crystal Cox bought more domain names, started more blogs, as Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group was getting her blogs removed and she felt she needed to tell her side of the story. Crystal Cox doing her own PR, fighting back and getting strong into the search engines, angered First Amendment Attorney Marc Randazza so he Sued his former Client Crystal Cox, in retaliation and to shut down her blogs criticizing him, and reporting on the biggest technology theft in the world, iViewit Technology, which his clients such as Corbin Fisher, Liberty Media Holdings and more are facing a massive liability over, which they are not telling their shareholders.

Here are the Details of the Nevada Lawsuit for Domain Names, Blogs, and around 3 Million Dollars, filed by Plaintiff Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group, with his attorney Ronald D. Green of Randazza Legal Group against a former client, Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox.

District of Nevada Case 2:12-cv-02040-GMN-PAL (Defendant Crystal Cox)
http://www.crystalcox.com/2013/02/crystal-l-cox-nevada-lawsuit-pro-se.html

Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox tried to file a counter claim in this case and was BLOCKED by Judge Gloria Navarro, who Crystal Cox alleges is acting in criminal and civil conspiracy with Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and others.

Crystal Cox alleges that Co-Conspirators use "Internet Mobbing" in order to create illusions to affect the outcome of each others cases, and get their clients or those they sue to settle quicker. Crystal Cox alleges that Co-Conspirators use law firm blogs, investigative blogs, and other media to create "Legal Commentary" that is knowingly false and defamatory, in order to use as evidence with Judges such as District of Nevada Judge Gloria Navarro, and to create the false perception of a case in the public eye, in order to win cases and get paid more and faster as attorneys who stand to gain considerably, financially in those cases.

Crystal Cox alleges that Marc J. Randazza of Randazza Legal Group and other alleged co-conspirators have harassed her, endangered her, defamed her, and have been involved in a pattern of Racketeering. Investigative Blogger Crystal Cox has therefore filed a RICO Complaint alleging this activity and to fight back against those who have caused her harm, endangered her life, intimidated her, harassed her, damaged her online media, and maliciously defamed her.

For more the Lawsuit filed by Investigative Blogger Crystal L. Cox, now Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox, you can view the District of Nevada RICO Complaint District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF, at the link below.

http://www.docstoc.com/docs/147018909/District-of-Nevada-213-cv-00297-JCM-NJK-Civil-RICO-Complaint-COX-vs-Randazza-RacketeerCorrupt-Organization-Jurisdiction-Diversity-Case

A Bit Regarding the Hypocrisy of it All
http://www.josephrakofsky.com/2013/03/pro-se-litigant-investigative-blogger.html




Many of these Named Defendants in Pro Se Plaintiff Crystal Cox's RICO Complaint 
District of Nevada 2:13-cv-00297-JCM-VCF  are also named in, Alleged Conspiracy 
in Rakofsky V. the Internet, a New York Legal Proceeding.


Rakofsky V. the Internet, Complaint

http://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-05-11-Rakofsky%20Complaint.pdf

Rakofsky V. the Internet Objection to Marc Randazza Motion
http://www.dmlp.org/sites/citmedialaw.org/files/2011-06-13-Rakofsky%20Opposition%20to%20Motion.pdf

AND many of these Defendants are also named in the RICO Complaint of the Biggest Technology THEFT in the World, iViewit Technology Company, founded by Inventor Eliot Bernstein.

iViewit Technology RICO Complaint
http://www.iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/United%20States%20District%20Court%20Southern%20District%20NY/20080509%20FINAL%20AMENDED%20COMPLAINT%20AND%20RICO%20SIGNED%20COPY%20MED.pdf

iViewit Technology SEC Complaint
http://iviewit.tv/CompanyDocs/20100206%20FINAL%20SEC%20FBI%20and%20more%20COMPLAINT%20Against%20Warner%20Bros%20Time%20Warner%20AOL176238nscolorlow.pdf

iViewit Technology Evidence 

eMail me if you know of anyone that should be on my eMail list for information, Pattern and History, regarding these any of the Named Defendants in my Federal RICO Filing, or if you want any documents for your research into these matters. 

Crystal@CrystalCox.com, 
SavvyBroker@Yahoo.com

No comments:

Post a Comment